MVD = Endotoxin limit X Concentration of the
product
Lysate sensitivity (λ).
Not
more than 145 Endotoxin units/mg X 0.68 mg/mL
=
------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.03 EU/mL
= 3286.66
Round off to 3072
Where:
0.03 EU/mL is Lysate label claim
sensitivity.
Concentration of the sample 0.68
mg/mL.
Not more than 145 Endotoxin units/mg is the Endotoxin limit of the
product.
|
S.No. |
Quantity of sample |
Quantity of LRW |
Sample dilution |
MVD |
|
1 |
2 mL of
sample |
4 mL |
1:3 |
MVD/1024 |
|
2 |
1 mL of 1:3 |
1 mL |
1:6 |
MVD/512 |
|
3 |
1 mL of 1:6 |
1 mL |
1:12 |
MVD/256 |
|
4 |
1 mL of 1:12 |
1 mL |
1:24 |
MVD/128 |
|
5 |
1 mL of 1:24 |
1 mL |
1:48 |
MVD/64 |
|
6 |
1 mL of 1:48 |
1 mL |
1:96 |
MVD/32 |
|
7 |
1 mL of 1:96 |
1 mL |
1:192 |
MVD/16 |
|
8 |
1 mL of 1:192 |
1 mL |
1:384 |
MVD/8 |
|
9 |
1 mL of 1:384 |
1 mL |
1:768 |
MVD/4 |
|
10 |
1 mL of 1:768 |
1 mL |
1:1536 |
MVD/2 |
|
11 |
1 mL of 1:1536 |
1 mL |
1:3072 |
MVD |
Sure. The 4 mL LRW in your first step comes from making a 1:3 dilution.
You have 2 mL of sample.
For a 1:3 dilution, the sample should be 1 part of the final 3 parts.
So:
You already have 2 mL sample, so the amount of LRW needed is:
Therefore:
2 mL sample + 4 mL LRW = 6 mL total
And:
So the final dilution is 1:3.
Simple formula
For your example:
That's why they use 4 mL LRW
Step 1: Ask: how much dilution do we need?
Current dilution = 100
Required dilution = 256
So:
That means the 1:100 solution needs to be diluted another 2.56 times.
Step 2: We decide to take 1 mL
Suppose we take:
1 mL of the 1:100 solution
We want this 1 mL to become a 2.56-fold dilution.
Therefore, the final volume must be 2.56 mL.
So:
To find the LRW:
That's where 1.56 mL LRW comes from.
Think of it like this
1.00 mL 1:100 solution + 1.56 mL LRW ↓ 2.56 mL total ↓ additional dilution = 2.56 ↓ 100 × 2.56 ↓ 1:256
So 1.56 mL is not a random number.
It is simply:
Required final volume − sample volume
2.56 mL − 1.00 mL = 1.56 mL LRW
Why do we choose 1 mL?
Because 1 mL is a convenient amount to work with. You could theoretically use another amount, but the LRW amount would change proportionally.
For example, using 2 mL of the 1:100 dilution:
LRW needed:
So 2 mL sample + 3.12 mL LRW also gives 1:256 overall.
The key formula to remember is:
LRW to add = (required final dilution ÷ current dilution × sample volume) − sample volume
For your case:
| Column | What it means | What you should write |
|---|---|---|
| Component / Function | What part, process, or activity are you analyzing? | Name the component and describe what it is supposed to do. |
| Potential Failure Mode | How could it fail? | Describe the specific way the component/process might not work as intended. |
| Potential Failure Effect or Consequence | What happens if it fails? | Describe the impact on the user, product, process, safety, quality, etc. |
| Contributory Factors / Failure Causes | Why could the failure happen? | List the possible causes or contributing factors. |
| Current Controls | What is already being done to prevent/detect the failure? | Inspections, alarms, testing, procedures, training, maintenance, checks, etc. |
| Severity (S) | How serious is the effect? | Usually rated 1–10, where 1 = negligible and 10 = very serious/catastrophic. |
| Occurrence (O) | How often is the failure likely to happen? | Usually 1–10, where 1 = very unlikely and 10 = frequent. |
| Detection (D) | How likely are you to detect the failure before it causes harm? | Usually 1–10, where 1 = very easy to detect and 10 = very difficult to detect. |
| RPN (S × O × D) | Overall risk priority number | Multiply the three ratings: RPN = S × O × D. |
| Risk Acceptance (Yes / No) | Is the calculated risk acceptable? | Write Yes if the risk is within your organization's acceptable limit; otherwise No. |
| Recommended Action(s) | What should be done to reduce the risk? | Improvements such as additional controls, redesign, testing, training, preventive maintenance, or monitoring. |










Comments
Post a Comment